ERRATUM
ERRATUM
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/stem.3177
复制
发表时间:
2020-04
期刊:
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
V. Brochard;L. Jouneau;A. Bonnet-Garnier;H. Jammes;L. Vallier;M. I.Gabrielle;Brons;A. Jouneau
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
V. Brochard;L. Jouneau;A. Bonnet-Garnier;H. Jammes;L. Vallier;M. I.Gabrielle;Brons;A. Jouneau
The above-referenced article, published in 2010, examined the derivation process and the transcriptome of epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) derived from either fertilized embryos (FT-EpiSCs) or somatic nuclear-transferred embryos (NT-EpiSCs). Nuclear-transferred embryos were obtained from cumulus cells injected into oocytes collected from B6D2F1 mice. Although the derivation process itself was very similar regardless of the origin of the cells, the comparison of the transcriptome by microarray did show a small number (25) of differentially expressed genes between 2 out of 3 NT lines, compared with 3 FT lines. The third line (called NT-1) was similar to FT. More recently, RNA sequencing of different EpiSC lines, including those previously characterized, was performed with the aim of looking at the allelic usage and imprinting in pluripotent cells [Dirks et al. Epigenetics & Chromatin 2019;12:14]. Allele-specific mapping was possible thanks to their hybrid genotype (B6D2F1). This in-depth analysis unexpectedly revealed that the recombined genotype structure of the two transcriptionally deviant EpiSCs (previously labeled as NT-2 and NT-LE) was only compatible with a parthenote origin. The third line used in the earlier study, NT-1, was clearly of NT-origin, according to its genotype. DOI: 10.1002/stem.3177