Taming the future: The dispositif of risk in the war on terror

Taming the future: The dispositif of risk in the war on terror
复制标题

驾驭未来：反恐战争中的风险处置

DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Rens van Munster
Rens van Munster
中科院分区：
--
文献类型：
--
作者：
Claudia Aradau;Rens van Munster

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

关于本书：本书首次对所谓反恐战争中出现的特定风险计算模式进行了全面而批判性的调查。 《风险与反恐战争》提供了一系列跨学科的贡献，对反恐战争中风险的经验表现及其理论含义进行了辩论和分析。从边境管制和生物识别到金融目标和警务实践，部署公共和私人数据以“连接”恐怖主义风险的必要性给社会科学家和从业者提出了重要问题。 如何将风险技术从商业、环境和警务领域重新部署到反恐战争领域？ 如何从概念上理解反恐战争中的风险援引？ 这些举措是否体现了从主权到治理的转变？从纪律到风险；从地缘政治到生命政治？ 这些举措对被认定为“有风险”或“处于危险中”的人群有何影响？ 这些做法的差距、模糊性和潜在阻力在哪里？
About the book: This book offers the first comprehensive and critical investigation of the specific modes of risk calculation that are emerging in the so-called War on Terror. Risk and the War on Terror offers an interdisciplinary set of contributions which debate and analyze both the empirical manifestations of risk in the War on Terror and their theoretical implications. From border controls and biometrics to financial targeting and policing practice, the imperative to deploy public and private data in order to ‘connect the dots’ of terrorism risk raises important questions for social scientists and practitioners alike. How are risk technologies redeployed from commercial, environmental and policing domains to the domain of the War on Terror? How can the invocation of risk in the War on Terror be understood conceptually? Do these moves embody transformations from sovereignty to governmentality; from discipline to risk; from geopolitics to biopolitics? What are the implications of such moves for the populations that come to be designated as ‘risky’ or ‘at risk’? Where are the gaps, ambiguities and potential resistances to these practices?