Stand-scale spatial patterns of soil microbial biomass in natural cold-temperate beech forests along an elevation gradient
Stand-scale spatial patterns of soil microbial biomass in natural cold-temperate beech forests along an elevation gradient
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.028
复制
发表时间:
2009-07
影响因子:
9.7
通讯作者:
Xin Zhao;Quan Wang;Y. Kakubari
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xin Zhao;Quan Wang;Y. Kakubari
This study focuses on spatial heterogeneity in the soil microbial biomass (SMB) of typical climax beech (Fagus crenata) at the stand scale in forest ecosystems of the cold-temperate mountain zones of Japan. Three beech-dominated sites were selected along an altitudinal gradient and grid sampling was used to collect soil samples at each site. The highest average SMB density was observed at the site 1500m a.s.l. (44.9gCm−2), the lowest was recorded at the site 700m a.s.l. (18.9gCm−2); the average SMB density at the 550m site (36.5gCm−2) was close to the overall median of all three sites. Geostatistics, which is specifically designed to take spatial autocorrelation into account, was then used to analyze the data collected. All sites generally exhibited stand-scale spatial autocorrelation at a lag distance of 10–18m in addition to the small-scale spatial dependence noted at <3.5m at the 550m site. Correlation analysis with an emphasis on spatial dependency showed SMB to be significantly correlated with bulk density at the 550 and 1500m sites, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) at the 700 and 1500m sites, and nitrogen (N) at the 550 and 700m sites. However, no soil parameter showed a significant correlation with SMB at every site, and some variables were also differently correlated (negative or positive) with SMB at different sites. This suggests that the factors controlling the spatial distribution of SMB are very complex and responsive to local in situ conditions. SMB regression models were generated from both the ordinary least-squares (OLS) and generalized least-squares (GLS) models. GLS performance was only superior to OLS when cross-variograms were accurately fitted. Geostatistics is preferable, however, since these techniques take the spatial non-stationarity of samples into account. In addition, the sampling numbers for given minimum detectable differences (MDDs) are provided for each site for future SMB monitoring.