Creeping Ethical Regulation and the Strangling of Research
Creeping Ethical Regulation and the Strangling of Research
复制标题
逐渐蔓延的道德监管和对研究的扼杀
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Hammersley
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Hammersley
1.1 2000年，英国社会科学的制度环境发生了重大变化，经济和社会研究理事会（ESRC）制定了研究伦理框架（REF），要求所有其成员寻求资助的机构必须执行规定的伦理监管程序。这一新制度的缺陷假设和危险影响已在其他地方概述（Dingwall 2006a 和 b 以及 2007；Hammersley 2006 和 2009）。修订后的研究伦理框架（FRE）保留了 REF 的六项原则，所有这些原则都具有必须“实施”的禁令的特征，但它在一些重要方面扩展了监管范围。 Stanley 和 Wise (2010) 在分析 FRE 方面提供了非常重要的服务；他们关于蠕动延伸的比喻无疑抓住了正在发生的事情。
1.1 In 2000, a major change in the institutional environment of UK social science occurred when the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) produced its Research Ethics Framework (REF), requiring that all institutions whose members seek funding must operate ethical regulation procedures of a prescribed kind. The defective assumptions and dangerous implications of this new regime have been outlined elsewhere (Dingwall 2006a and b and 2007; Hammersley 2006 and 2009). The revised version, the Framework for Research Ethics (FRE), retains the REF’s six principles, all of which have the character of injunctions that must be ‘implemented’, but it extends the scope of regulation in some significant ways. Stanley and Wise (2010) have provided a very important service in analysing the FRE; and their metaphor of creeping extension certainly captures what is happening.