Challenges for forecasting based on accelerating rates of earthquakes at volcanoes and laboratory analogues
Challenges for forecasting based on accelerating rates of earthquakes at volcanoes and laboratory analogues
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-246x.2011.04982.x
复制
发表时间:
2011-05
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
A. Bell;J. Greenhough;M. Heap;I. Main
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Bell;J. Greenhough;M. Heap;I. Main
SUMMARY ‘Mean-field’ models have been proposed as falsifiable hypotheses for the acceleration in earthquake rate and other geophysical parameters prior to laboratory rock failure and volcanic eruptions. Importantly, such models may permit forecasting failure or eruption time. However, inexistingretrospectiveanalysesitiscommontofindexamplesofinappropriatetechniquesfor fittingthesemodelstodata.Herewetestthetwomaincompetinghypotheses—exponentialand power-law acceleration—using maximum likelihood techniques and an information criterion for model choice, based on a Poisson process with variable rate. For examples from the laboratory and Mt Etna, the power law is clearly the best model, both in terms of the fit and the resulting error structure, which is consistent with the Poisson approximation. For examples from Kilauea and Mauna Loa the results are less clear-cut and the confidence interval underestimates the number of outliers. Deviations from the models most likely reflect local interactions and/or non-stationary loading processes not captured by the mean-field approach. In addition, we use simulations to demonstrate an inherent problem with model preference, in that a power-law model will only be preferred if failure or eruption occurs close to the singularity. Although mean-field models may well provide valuable insight into the physical process responsible for precursory accelerations in earthquake rate, our findings highlight major difficulties that must be overcome to use such models for forecasting.