Measuring adolescent alcohol outcome expectancies.
Measuring adolescent alcohol outcome expectancies.
复制标题
测量青少年酒精结果预期。
DOI：
10.1037//0893-164x.14.2.206
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D'Amico,EJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fromme,K;D'Amico,EJ
酒精的综合效应（CEOA）问卷的心理测量学特性和结构效度进行了比较与酒精期望量表-青少年版本（AEQ-A）的青少年饮酒。这两种措施的青少年酒精预期被认为是内部可靠的和暂时稳定的。饮酒与CEOA中认知和行为障碍以及自我感知的主观评价显著相关，与AEQ-A中认知和运动障碍以及社会行为变化的预期影响显著相关。与AEQ-A相比，CEOA解释了青少年饮酒量的更多差异（28%）和频率的相似差异（15%）（AEQ-A数量= 20%，频率= 15%）。而一般内容和心理测量学性质的2个措施是显着相似的，李克特回答格式，较短的长度，并与CEOA的预期效果和主观评价的评估可能提供测量优势AEQ-A。
The psychometric properties and construct validity of the Comprehensive Effects of Alcohol (CEOA) questionnaire were compared with those of the Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire—Adolescent version (AEQ–A) in relation to adolescent alcohol consumption. Both measures of adolescent alcohol expectancies were found to be internally reliable and temporally stable. Alcohol use was significantly associated with subjective evaluations for Cognitive and Behavioral Impairment and Self-Perception on the CEOA and with expected effects for Cognitive and Motor Impairment and Changes in Social Behavior on the AEQ–A. Compared with the AEQ–A, the CEOA explained more variance in quantity (28%) and a similar variance in frequency (15%) for adolescent alcohol use (AEQ–A quantity= 20%, frequency= 15%). Whereas the general content and psychometric properties of the 2 measures are markedly similar, the Likert response format, shorter length, and assessment of both expected effects and subjective evaluations with the CEOA may offer measurement advantages over the AEQ–A.