Construct, Face, and Content Validation on Voxel-Man® Simulator for Otologic Surgical Training.
Construct, Face, and Content Validation on Voxel-Man® Simulator for Otologic Surgical Training.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1155/2017/2707690
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Parietti-Winkler C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Varoquier M;Hoffmann CP;Perrenot C;Tran N;Parietti-Winkler C
目标。评估体素-人TempoSurg虚拟现实模拟器的面部、内容和结构有效性。参与者和方法：74名耳鼻喉外科医生参与研究。根据他们的专业水平，他们被分为两组：专家组（n = 16）和新手组（n = 58）。参与者在模拟器上执行了四项颞骨解剖任务。通过整体评分来评估性能，然后进行比较，以评估模拟器的构造有效性。最后，专家组采用李克特五分制量表对面孔效度和内容效度进行评估。结果。经验丰富的外科医生比新手表现更好（p < 0.01），速度更快（p < 0.001）。然而，两组在骨移除量（p = 0.11）或损伤数（p = 0.37）方面没有差异。93.7%的经验丰富的外科医生表示他们会推荐使用该模拟器进行解剖学习。大多数（87.5%）还认为可以将其纳入外科培训。结论。Voxel-Man TempoSurg虚拟现实模拟器是传统耳外科培训教学方法的有趣补充工具。
Objective. To assess the face, content, and construct validity of the Voxel-Man TempoSurg Virtual Reality simulator. Participants and Methods. 74 ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons participated. They were assigned to one of two groups according to their level of expertise: the expert group (n = 16) and the novice group (n = 58). The participants performed four temporal bone dissection tasks on the simulator. Performances were assessed by a global score and then compared to assess the construct validity of the simulator. Finally, the expert group assessed the face and content validity by means of a five-point Likert-type scale. Results. experienced surgeons performed better (p < .01) and faster (p < .001) than the novices. However, the groups did not differ in terms of bone volume removed (p = .11) or number of injuries (p = .37). 93.7% of experienced surgeons stated they would recommend this simulator for anatomical learning. Most (87.5%) also thought that it could be integrated into surgical training. Conclusion. The Voxel-Man TempoSurg Virtual Reality simulator constitutes an interesting complementary tool to traditional teaching methods for training in otologic surgery.