PRÉCIS AND REPLIES TO CONTRIBUTORS FOR BOOK SYMPOSIUM ON ACCURACY AND THE LAWS OF CREDENCE
PRÉCIS AND REPLIES TO CONTRIBUTORS FOR BOOK SYMPOSIUM ON ACCURACY AND THE LAWS OF CREDENCE
复制标题
关于准确性和信任法则的图书研讨会的概要和对贡献者的回复
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Richard Pettigrew
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Richard Pettigrew
这本关于准确性和信任法的研讨会包括作者理查德·佩蒂格鲁对这本书的论点的概述，以及对该论点的不同方面的四种评论。本·莱夫斯坦挑战了对不准确的合法衡量标准的描述，而这些衡量标准在本书的论点中扮演着核心角色。朱莉娅·斯塔菲尔问这本书的论点是否与道克斯主义状态的本体论兼容，该本体论包括完整的信仰和信誉。法布里齐奥·卡里亚尼对书中提出的各种机会信任原则的论点表示担忧。索菲·霍洛维茨质疑了书中对冷漠原则的论证中的假设，并询问了书中考虑的各种信任定律是如何相互联系的。
ABSTRACT This book symposium on Accuracy and the Laws of Credence consists of an overview of the book’s argument by the author, Richard Pettigrew, together with four commentaries on different aspects of that argument. Ben Levinstein challenges the characterisation of the legitimate measures of inaccuracy that plays a central role in the arguments of the book. Julia Staffel asks whether the arguments of the book are compatible with an ontology of doxastic states that includes full beliefs as well as credences. Fabrizio Cariani raises concerns about the argument offered in the book for various chance-credence principles. And Sophie Horowitz questions the assumptions at play in the book’s argument for the Principle of Indifference, as well as asking how the various laws of credence considered in the book relate to one another.