Conflicting motives in evaluations of sequences
Conflicting motives in evaluations of sequences
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11166-008-9051-z
复制
发表时间：
2008-12-01
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Loewenstein, George
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Frederick, Shane;Loewenstein, George
先前的研究涉及在趋势不同的序列中进行选择，通常记录了对改进序列的偏好。然而，当我们调查序列偏好使用分配和定价任务，我们发现没有证据的偏好改善序列。我们建议，不同的测量程序突出或抑制不同的考虑因素，驱动偏好对现在的消费，未来的消费或时间中立。我们讨论我们的结果在更广泛的背景下，构建的偏好和收敛效度。
Prior research involving choices among sequences differing in trend has typically documented a preference for improving sequences. However, when we investigated sequence preferences using allocation and pricing tasks we found no evidence for a preference for improving sequences. We propose that different measurement procedures highlight or suppress varied considerations that drive preferences toward present consumption, future consumption or temporal neutrality. We discuss our results in the broader context of constructed preferences and convergent validity.