Limitations and alternatives: ethical practice theory in nursing.
Limitations and alternatives: ethical practice theory in nursing.
复制标题
局限性和替代方案：护理中的伦理实践理论。
DOI：
10.1097/00012272-198807000-00007
复制
发表时间：
1988
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Scalzi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Huggins;C. Scalzi
当过早地选择一个理论框架来指导理论建设时，就会遇到发现的局限性。科尔伯格的理论，被凯特菲安选为护理伦理实践理论的框架，可能不能反映护士的生活经验。虽然科尔伯格的理论呼吁正义伦理，但吉利根的研究表明，大多数女性做出的伦理决定都是基于关怀伦理。对于过早选择指导框架的另一种选择是首先描述护士的道德决策，然后选择最适合护理实际的框架。
Limitations in findings are encountered when a theoretical framework is selected prematurely to guide theory building. Kohlberg's theory, chosen by Ketefian as the framework for an ethical practice theory of nursing may not reflect the life experiences of nurses. While Kohlberg's theory calls for an ethic of justice, Gilligan's research suggests that most women make ethical decisions based on an ethic of care. An alternative to the premature selection of a guiding framework is first to describe the moral decision making of nurses and then to choose the framework that best fits the reality of nursing.