Ueber die Willenst?tigkeit und das Denken.
Ueber die Willenst?tigkeit und das Denken.
复制标题
Ueber die Willenst?tigkeit und das Denken。
DOI：
10.1037/h0067584
复制
发表时间：
--
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Robert H. Gault
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Robert H. Gault
评论Naritz Ach的《Ueber die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken》（1905）。这是一种通过普通的反应实验，特别是通过受试者的内省报告来分析意志的尝试。这当然提出了内省作为一种心理学方法的有效性问题。所有的实验都是在没有知识的情况下进行的，被试没有心理实验的经验。感觉和肌肉集合的特征以及观察者的报告使作者得出结论，兰格将反应分为感觉和肌肉类型是没有充分理由的。没有一个受试者能够报告在感知刺激和产生运动之间发生的任何经验，因此作者得出结论，没有特定的意志冲动。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Reviews the book, Ueber die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken by Naritz Ach (1905). This is an attempt at an analysis of the will by means of the ordinary reaction experiments, and especially by means of the introspective reports of the subjects. This of course raises the question of the validity of introspection as a psychological method. All experiments were performed without knowledge and the subjects were without experience in psychological experiments. The character of the sensory and muscular sets and the reports of the observers lead the author to conclude that there is not sufficient ground for Lange's division of reactions into sensory and muscular types. No subject was able to report any experience occurring between the moment, of perception of the stimulus and the production of the movement, and hence the author concludes that there is no specific will impulse.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)