Looking for a quick fix: how weak social auditing is keeping workers in sweatshops
Looking for a quick fix: how weak social auditing is keeping workers in sweatshops
复制标题
寻找快速解决方案：社会审计的薄弱导致工人留在血汗工厂
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Haan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Pruett;Jeroen Merk;Ineke Zeldenrust;E. Haan
1990年代中期，一些知名公司因其供应链中的工作条件不合标准而受到广泛审查，之后出现了检查生产设施工作条件的社会审计。当时，越来越多的公司--比如耐克、盖普、李维斯和C& A--都采用了行为准则，这些准则本质上是保证防止剥削和虐待生产他们产品的工人。劳工维权人士很快就向这些公司提出挑战，要求它们证明自己符合它们所采用的标准。有人呼吁开展独立的、基于民间社会的工作场所评估。
Social audits to check working conditions in production facilities emerged in the mid-1990s after a number of high profile companies were widely scrutinized for substandard working conditions in their supply chains. At that time, a growing number of companies-for example Nike, Gap, Levi Strauss, and C&A-had adopted codes of conduct that in essence were pledges to prevent exploitation and abuse of workers producing their goods. Labour advocates soon challenged these companies to demonstrate conformity to the standards they had adopted. Calls for independent, civil society based forms of workplace assessments were made.