Do people contribute more to intra-temporal or inter-temporal public goods?
Do people contribute more to intra-temporal or inter-temporal public goods?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.rie.2015.05.001
复制
发表时间：
2016-03-01
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
Vranceanu, Radu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Grolleau, Gilles;Sutan, Angela;Vranceanu, Radu
我们引入了一个动态公共产品博弈，其中个人在某一轮对公共产品的投资会在下一轮为其他个人带来收益，而个人自己也会从其当前群体成员在前一轮对公共产品的投资中获益。在这种跨时间背景下，实验对象比在同一时期交换捐赠和转移的标准公共物品实验中更加慷慨。此外，当已知时，过去投资的收益与个人当前对公共产品的投资呈正相关。(C) 2015威尼斯大学。Elsevier Ltd.出版。版权所有。
We introduce a dynamic public goods game, where an individual's investment in the public good at a given round provides benefits to other individuals in the next round, and the individual himself benefits from investments in the public good made by his current group members in the previous round. Subjects turn out to be more generous in this inter temporal context than in a standard public goods experiment where contributions and transfers are exchanged at the same period. Furthermore, when known, benefits from the past investment are positively related to the individual's current investment in the public good. (C) 2015 University of Venice. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.