Training Propositional Reasoning
Training Propositional Reasoning
复制标题
训练命题推理
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Birgit Naumer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. C. Klauer;T. Meiser;Birgit Naumer
两个实验比较了四种训练条件对命题推理的影响。句法训练演示了形式推导，抽象语义训练解释了逻辑连接词的标准真值表定义，特定领域语义训练为推理任务的前提提供了主题上下文。在对照训练中，练习归纳推理任务。根据心理模型的解释，两种语义训练的效果都显著高于对照组和句法训练，而对照组和句法训练之间没有显著差异，两种语义训练之间也没有显著差异。实验2使用一组不同的语法和特定领域的训练条件复制了这种效果模式。
Two experiments compared the effects of four training conditions on propositional reasoning. A syntactic training demonstrated formal derivations, in an abstract semantic training the standard truth-table definitions of logical connectives were explained, and a domain-specific semantic training provided thematic contexts for the premises of the reasoning task. In a control training, an inductive reasoning task was practised. In line with the account by mental models, both kinds of semantic training were significantly more effective than the control and the syntactic training, whereas there were no significant differences between the control and the syntactic training, nor between the two kinds of semantic training. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern of effects using a different set of syntactic and domain-specific training conditions.