Mapping nature's contribution to SDG 6 and implications for other SDGs at policy relevant scales
Mapping nature's contribution to SDG 6 and implications for other SDGs at policy relevant scales
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.rse.2020.111671
复制
发表时间：
2020-03
影响因子：
13.5
通讯作者：
M. Mulligan;A. Soesbergen;D. Hole;T. Brooks;S. Burke;J. Hutton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Mulligan;A. Soesbergen;D. Hole;T. Brooks;S. Burke;J. Hutton
从可持续发展目标（SDG）的透镜来看，自然界对社会具有多重、有时相互冲突、有时协同的价值。自然界对SDG贡献的空间测绘有可能通过可持续土地管理和生态系统服务保护来支持SDG战略的实施。这种测绘需要一系列空间数据。本文探讨了遥感和空间生态系统服务模型的使用，以研究自然对可持续发展目标6下目标的贡献，还强调了与其他关键可持续发展目标的协同作用以及与农业的权衡。我们使用广泛的遥感和全球可用数据集（土地覆盖、气候、土壤、人口、农业）以及现有且广泛使用的空间生态系统服务评估工具Co$tingNature。通过这些，我们确定了可持续管理的优先领域，以实现马达加斯加国家规模和沃尔特流域流域规模的可持续发展目标6（水）下的目标，尽管开发的应用程序可以应用于世界上任何国家或主要流域。在SDG 6的优先领域足迹中，我们评估了该土地为SDG 15提供的协同效应和权衡（生物多样性）和可持续发展目标13（气候行动）以及可持续发展目标2结果突出了可持续管理自然对可持续发展目标6的贡献的共同效益，例如保护森林覆盖率。（可持续发展目标15.2）、碳储存作为对巴黎气候协定和国家自主贡献的贡献（可持续发展目标13）和生物多样性（可持续发展目标15.5），以及与零饥饿目标的权衡（可持续发展目标2）。这些分析有助于更好地了解土地管理要求，通过保护和恢复绿色基础设施实现多个可持续发展目标。我们在Co$tingNature平台内提供了一个免费的工具，基于各种遥感产品，可供SDG实践者用于进行类似的分析，并为全球国家或国家以下各级的决策提供信息。
The natural world has multiple, sometimes conflicting, sometimes synergistic, values to society when viewed through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Spatial mapping of nature's contributions to the SDGs has the potential to support the implementation of SDG strategies through sustainable land management and conservation of ecosystem services. Such mapping requires a range of spatial data. This paper examines the use of remote sensing and spatial ecosystem service modelling to examine nature's contribution to targets under SDG 6, also highlighting synergies with other key SDGs and trade-offs with agriculture.We use a wide range of remotely sensed and globally available datasets (for land cover, climate, soil, population, agriculture) alongside the existing and widely used spatial ecosystem services assessment tool, Co$tingNature. With these we identify priority areas for sustainable management to realise targets under SDG 6 (water) at the country scale for Madagascar and at the basin scale for the Volta basin, though the application developed can be applied to any country or major basin in the world. Within this SDG 6 priority areas footprint, we assess the synergies and trade-offs provided by this land for SDG 15 (biodiversity) and SDG 13 (climate action) as well as SDG 2 (zero hunger).Results highlight the co-benefits of sustainably managing nature's contribution to SDG 6, such as the protection of forest cover (for SDG target 15.2), carbon storage as a contribution to the Paris climate agreement and nationally determined contributions (SDG 13) and biodiversity (for SDG target 15.5) but also trade-offs with the zero hunger goal (for SDG 2). Such analyses allow for better understanding of land management requirements for realising multiple SDGs through protection and restoration of green infrastructure. We provide a freely available tool, within the Co$tingNature platform, based on a variety of remotely sensed products, that can be used by SDG practitioners to carry out similar analyses and inform decision-making at national or sub-national levels globally.