The 2009 Comparative Education Review Bibliography: Patterns of Internationalization in the Field

The 2009 Comparative Education Review Bibliography: Patterns of Internationalization in the Field
复制标题

2009年比较教育评论书目:该领域的国际化模式

DOI:
10.1086/653543
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
R. Raby
R. Raby
中科院分区:
教育学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Raby

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

比较教育和国际教育由多个学科组成,因此《比较教育评论》(CER) 的读者代表了众多的兴趣。 CER 参考书目的任务是扩大相关文章的范围,供那些在进行简单搜索时可能忽略来源的研究人员使用。 CER 参考书目中收录的期刊不仅限于一般教育领域,也不限于专门针对比较教育和国际教育的期刊。参考书目的广泛覆盖使我们能够看到学术话语的变化。完整的 2009 年 CER 参考书目以及 1999 年至 2008 年过去的参考书目可在线找到:http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CER/index .html。 2009 年 CER 参考书目包含 1,971 篇文章,是所有 CER 参考书目中第二大的。尽管其规模很大,但参考书目的某些领域的出版物数量却出现了下降。这些变化表明,一些几十年来与我们领域密切相关的主题不再引起当代作者的兴趣。这些转变既定义又预测了更大的学术趋势。本文利用 CER 参考书目中期刊和文章数量的变化来反思 2009 年我们领域的话语变化。
Comparative and international education comprises several disciplines, and so Comparative Education Review (CER) readers represent a myriad of interests. The task of the CER bibliography is to broaden the range of pertinent articles available to researchers who may overlook sources when doing a simple search. Journals included in the CER bibliography are not exclusively from the general field of education, nor are they confined to those journals specifically in comparative and international education. The broad coverage of the bibliography permits us to see the changing scholarly discourses. The complete 2009 CER bibliography, as well as past bibliographies from 1999 to 2008, can be found online at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CER/index .html. The 2009 CER bibliography contains 1,971 articles, the second largest of any CER bibliography. Despite its size, there are areas of the bibliography that have experienced a decline in publications. These changes illustrate that some topics that remained germane in our field for decades are no longer of interest to the current generation of authors. These shifts both define and forecast larger academic tendencies. This essay uses the changing number of journals and articles in the CER bibliography to reflect on the changing discourse in our field during 2009.