Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment
Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001
复制
发表时间：
2004-01-01
影响因子：
12.8
通讯作者：
Robie, C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Babcock, JC;Green, CE;Robie, C
这篇荟萃分析综述考察了22项评估家庭暴力男性治疗效果的研究结果。回顾了受控准实验和实验研究的结果文献，以检验Duluth模型、认知行为疗法(CBT)和其他类型的治疗对随后的暴力再犯的相对影响。研究设计和处理类型作为调节因素被测试。处理设计对效应大小的影响较小。在比较Duluth模型和CBT类型的干预措施时，效果大小没有差异。总体而言，治疗的影响很小，这意味着目前的干预措施除了被逮捕的效果外，对减少累犯率的影响微乎其微。提供了与其他人群的治疗相类似的方法以供比较。讨论了对政策决策和未来研究的影响。(C)2004爱思唯尔有限公司。保留所有权利。
This meta-analytic review examines the findings of 22 studies evaluating treatment efficacy for domestically violent males. The outcome literature of controlled quasi-experimental and experimental studies was reviewed to test the relative impact of Duluth model, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and other types of treatment on subsequent recidivism of violence. Study design and type of treatment were tested as moderators. Treatment design tended to have a small influence on effect size. There were no differences in effect sizes in comparing Duluth model vs. CBT-type interventions. Overall, effects due to treatment were in the small range, meaning that the current interventions have a minimal impact on reducing recidivism beyond the effect of being arrested. Analogies to treatment for other populations are presented for comparison. Implications for policy decisions and future research are discussed. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.