Measurement of equivalence between the web and paper versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire
Measurement of equivalence between the web and paper versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire
复制标题
日本骨科协会髋关节疾病评估问卷网络版和纸质版之间的等效性测量
DOI：
10.1080/14397595.2019.1592799
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Ishiguro Naoki
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Takegami Yasuhiko;Seki Taisuke;Higuchi Yoshitoshi;Osawa Yusuke;Ishiguro Naoki
目的：数字化患者报告的结果可能对医生和患者都有益。日本骨科协会髋关节疾病评估问卷（JHEQ）只能用纸笔填写（pJHEQ）。我们最近开发了一个web版本的JHEQ （wJHEQ）。本研究旨在确定使用wJHEQ获得的分数是否与使用pJHEQ获得的分数相等，wJHEQ可以减少多少缺失答案，以及参与者更喜欢使用哪种JHEQ。方法：为了衡量pJHEQ和wJHEQ之间的等效性，我们评估了每个子量表（疼痛、运动、心理）和视觉模拟量表（VAS；满意度、右髋关节疼痛、左髋关节疼痛）的平均得分差，然后评估了两个分数之间的类内相关系数（ICC）。ICC值≥0.75定义为非常一致。我们使用Bland-Altman分析来评估两个问卷值之间的一致程度。我们比较了两份问卷不完整表格的数量和缺失数据的数量。我们通过询问参与者哪种格式更容易使用来调查易用性。结果：本研究纳入113例髋关节疾病患者（平均年龄58.1岁，81%为女性）。wJHEQ和pJHEQ各分量表的平均得分差异无显著性差异。各子量表和VAS的ICC值均为>0.75。所有113名参与者都完成了wJHEQ问卷，而9名患者没有完成pJHEQ表格。wJHEQ完成率与pJHEQ完成率差异有统计学意义（p= 0.0017）。57名参与者（55%）喜欢wJHEQ，而33名参与者（32%）喜欢pJHEQ。结论：wJHEQ与原pJHEQ相当。wJHEQ显著减少了漏答和表格不完整的数量。参与者觉得易用性几乎是相等的。wJHEQ可能有助于促进临床试验和研究中更全面的评估。
Objectives:Digitised patient-reported outcome may be beneficial for physicians and patients. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) can only be completed with paper and pencil (pJHEQ). We newly developed a web version of the JHEQ (wJHEQ). This study aimed to determine whether the scores obtained with the wJHEQ are equivalent to those from the pJHEQ, how much the wJHEQ would decrease missing answers, and which JHEQ the participants preferred to use.Methods:To measure equivalence between the pJHEQ and wJHEQ, we evaluated the mean score difference for each subscale (pain, movement, mental) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; satisfaction, right hip pain, left hip pain) and then assessed the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between the two scores. ICC values ≥0.75 were defined as excellent agreement. We used Bland–Altman analysis to assess level of agreement between the values of the two questionnaires. We compared the number of incomplete forms and amount of missing data between the two questionnaires. We investigated ease of use by asking the participants which format was easier to use.Results:This study comprised 113 patients (mean age 58.1 years, 81% female) with hip disease. Mean score differences for each subscale between the wJHEQ and pJHEQ were not significantly different. The values of ICC for each subscale and each VAS were all >0.75. All 113 participants completed the wJHEQ questionnaire, whereas nine patients did not complete the pJHEQ form. There was a significant statistical difference between the completion rate of the wJHEQ and that of the pJHEQ (p= .0017). Fifty-seven participants (55%) preferred the wJHEQ, whereas 33 participants (32%) preferred the pJHEQ.Conclusion:The wJHEQ was found to be equivalent to the original pJHEQ. The wJHEQ significantly decreased the numbers of missing answers and incomplete forms. The participants felt ease of use was nearly equivalent. The wJHEQ might help facilitate more complete assessments in clinical trials and research.
全关节置换术后，患者对纸质版和电子版 WOMAC 和 SF-12 的反应类似。
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Jacquelyn D. Marsh;D. Bryant;S. MacDonald;D. Naudie
通讯作者：
D. Naudie
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Seki, Taisuke;Hasegawa, Yukiharu;Hiejima, Yoshimitsu
通讯作者：
Hiejima, Yoshimitsu
日本骨科协会髋关节疾病评估问卷平板电脑版的有效性：一项试点研究。
影响因子：
0.9
作者：
Takegami Y;Seki T;Kaneuji A;Nakao A;Hasegawa Y;Ishiguro N.
通讯作者：
Ishiguro N.