Assessment of Google Glass as an adjunct in neurological surgery.
Assessment of Google Glass as an adjunct in neurological surgery.
复制标题
DOI：
10.4103/sni.sni_277_16
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Chen JW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sahyouni R;Moshtaghi O;Tran DK;Kaloostian S;Rajaii R;Bustillo D;Chen JW
我们评估了谷歌眼镜（“眼镜”）在改善术后回顾（“汇报”）和加强高等学术医疗中心神经外科教育方面的作用。这是一项前瞻性研究。参与者是三级护理1级学术创伤中心神经外科医生的患者。住院医师在手术后立即接受了预调查问卷。接下来，住院医生和主治医生通过回顾Glass手术记录进行汇报。然后，居民完成了一份由4部分组成的后问卷。评估问题1-3：（1）住院医生对手术的舒适度，（2）上级提供的教育质量，（3）重复手术的舒适度。问题4评估：（4）使用Glass进行汇报的感知益处。收集了12份调查。评分基于5分Likert量表，评分越高，对应的反应越积极。对于问题1-3，问卷调查前后的平均得分分别为3.75和4.42（P <0.05）。对于问题4，平均问卷后评分为4.63，表明术后Glass审查提高了他们对手术的技术理解。Glass显著提高了神经外科住院医师的舒适度和培训质量，并提供了一种高保真、可靠和可修改的工具，增强了住院医师的理解、专业知识和教育体验。值得注意的是，某些限制，如可变的电池寿命，可变的图像质量，并与外科医生放大镜低于标准的兼容性仍然必须克服玻璃成为一个现实的除了神经外科教育。
We assess Google Glass (“Glass”) in improving postoperative review (“debriefing”) and augmenting education in Neurological Surgery at a tertiary academic medical center. This was a prospective study. Participants were patients of Neurological Surgery physicians at a Tertiary Care Level 1 Academic Trauma Center. Resident physicians received a pre-questionnaire immediately following surgery. Next, the resident and attending physicians debriefed by reviewing the Glass operative recording. Then, residents completed a 4-part post-questionnaire. Questions 1–3 assessed: (1) the residents’ comfort level with the procedure, (2) the quality of education provided by their superiors, and (3) their comfort level in repeating the operation. Question 4 assessed: (4) the perceived benefit of debriefing using Glass. Twelve surveys were collected. Scores were based on a 5-point Likert scale, with a higher score corresponding to a more positive response. For Questions 1–3, the average pre- and post-questionnaire scores were 3.75 and 4.42, respectively (P <.05). For Question 4, the average post-questionnaire score was 4.63, suggesting that postoperative Glass review improved their technical understanding of the procedure. Glass significantly improved neurosurgery residents’ comfort level and quality of training, and provided a high fidelity, reliable, and modifiable tool that enhanced residents’ understanding, expertise, and educational experience. Of note, certain limitations such as variable battery life, variable image quality, and subpar compatibility with surgeon loupes must still be overcome for Glass to become a realistic addition to neurosurgical education.