A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures
A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.029
复制
发表时间：
2014-10-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
de Vries, Reinout E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Holtrop, Djurre;Born, Marise Ph;de Vries, Reinout E.
本研究比较了两种类型的参考框架修改的效果，彼此和基线通用措施。通用人格量表，标记量表与“在学校”，并完全修改的规模进行了比较，在他们的预测的学习成绩，适得其反的学术行为，和参与者的反应。为此，HEXACO-PI-R（n = 215）和MFT-BS（n = 316）由学生在受试者内设计中填写。结果表明，标准效度显着增加，从通用的，标记，完全语境化的人格量表。随着情境化程度的增加，表面效度和感知预测效度提高。目前的研究表明，完全情境化的个性项目增加标准效度比只是添加一个标签的项目。(C)2014爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
The present study compared the effect of two types of Frame-of-Reference modifications to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with 'at school', and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. To this end the HEXACO-PI-R (n = 215) and the MFT-BS (n = 316) were filled out by students in a within-subject design. Results showed a significant increase in criterion validity from generic, to tagged, to completely contextualized personality scales. Face validity and perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. The current study indicates that completely contextualizing personality items increases criterion validity more than just adding a tag to items. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.