Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships

Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships
复制标题

DOI:
10.1023/b:aseb.0000037428.41757.10
复制
发表时间:
2004-10-01
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Maitland, SB
Maitland, SB
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Beres, MA;Herold, E;Maitland, SB

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

同意是定义性胁迫的一个关键问题,但很少有研究人员分析了性同意的态度和行为,迄今为止,还没有发表研究同性关系中的性同意。这项研究的主要目的是确定人们使用哪些行为来要求和表示同意他们的同性伴侣。一个同性性同意量表被开发来衡量同性关系中的主动和回应同意行为。使用在线调查从257名参与者(127名男性,130名女性)收集数据。参与者报告使用非语言行为比语言行为更频繁地表示同意。探索性因素分析的启动和响应分量表,每个分量表的四个因素。启动分量表的四个因素是涉及触摸的非语言行为、无抵抗行为、语言行为和无触摸的非语言行为。反应分量表的因素包括无抵抗行为、言语行为、非言语行为和脱衣行为。男男性行为者(MSM)和女女性行为者(WSW)在发起行为上没有显著差异;然而,在回应发起行为时,MSM报告使用的非语言信号比WSW多。在这项研究中开发的规模应该是有用的其他研究人员谁希望研究的主题性同意。
Consent is a key issue in defining sexual coercion yet few researchers have analyzed sexual consent attitudes and behaviors and, to date, there has been no published research examining sexual consent within same-sex relationships. The main objective of this study was to identify which behaviors people use to ask for and to indicate sexual consent to their same-sex partner(s). A Same-Sex Sexual Consent Scale was developed to measure both initiating and responding consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Data were collected using an on-line survey from 257 participants ( 127 men, 130 women). The participants reported using nonverbal behaviors significantly more frequently than verbal behaviors to indicate consent. Exploratory factor analysis for the Initiating and Responding subscales resulted in four factors for each subscale. The four factors for the Initiating Subscale were nonverbal behaviors involving touch, no resistance behaviors, verbal behaviors, and nonverbal behaviors without touch. The factors for the Responding Subscale were no resistance behaviors, verbal behaviors, nonverbal behaviors, and undressing behaviors. There were no significant differences in the initiating behaviors used by men who have sex with men (MSM) and women who have sex with women (WSW); however, when responding to initiating behavior, MSM reported using significantly more nonverbal signals than did WSW. The scale that was developed in this study should be useful for other researchers who wish to study the topic of sexual consent.