Two conceptions of maturity examined in the findings of a longitudinal study.

Two conceptions of maturity examined in the findings of a longitudinal study.
复制标题

纵向研究的结果检验了两种成熟度概念。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1987
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
P. Wink
P. Wink
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Helson;P. Wink

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

修订后的加州心理量表(CPI)的第三个矢量分数(胜任力)和洛文杰句子完成测验(SCT)评估的自我水平是对成熟度概念化的替代方法的测量:作为个体在社会中有效运作的能力或作为内心分化和自主的程度。一项对妇女的纵向研究(CPI,N = 107; SCT,N = 90)提供了这两项43岁时成熟度的指标。能力和自我水平与从有关工作、婚姻、与父母关系等的清单和生活史材料中选择的先行和同时测量相关,以评估适应奥尔波特的成熟度方面:在重大努力中的自我扩展,在自我和他人的感知中以及在一个人的活动中的现实取向,亲密能力,情感安全,和个人整合的个性。21岁的数据表明,能力和自我水平是持久的特质复合体。尽管有相当多的重叠,他们的差异显着的能力,情绪安全和自我水平的个人整合的个性更强调。对整个样本和同质群体中的能力和自我水平的模式进行分析,发现这两种成熟度差异很大,自我水平与适应的关系呈曲线型。
The third vector score (competence) of the revised California Psychological Inventory (CPI) and ego level as assessed by the Loevinger Sentence Completion Test (SCT) are measures of alternative ways of conceptualizing maturity: as the ability of the individual to function effectively in society or as the degree of intrapsychic differentiation and autonomy. A longitudinal study of women (for the CPI, N = 107; for the SCT, N = 90) provides these two measures of maturity at age 43. Competence and ego level were correlated with antecedent and concurrent measures selected from inventories and life history material concerning work, marriage, relations with parents, and so forth, to assess aspects of maturity adapted from Allport: self-extension in significant endeavors, reality orientation in perception of self and others and in the conduct of one's activities, capacity for intimacy, emotional security, and individuality of personal integration. Results from the age-21 data indicate that competence and ego level are enduring trait complexes. Despite considerable overlap, they differ conspicuously in the greater emphasis of competence on emotional security and of ego level on individuality of personal integration. Analysis of the patterning of competence and ego level in the whole sample and in homogeneous groups high on one or both measures suggests psychological reasons why the two types of maturity diverge and why the relation of ego level to adjustment seems to be curvilinear.