The chemical analysis of oriental ceramic body compositions: Part 2—Greenwares
The chemical analysis of oriental ceramic body compositions: Part 2—Greenwares
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0305-4403(86)90063-4
复制
发表时间：
1986-05
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
A. M. Pollard;H. Hatcher
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. M. Pollard;H. Hatcher
本文介绍了用原子吸收光谱法对中国青瓷体进行的130余次化学分析的结果。较早的浙北越瓷与较晚的龙泉青瓷具有明显的化学差异。在北方青瓷（假定来自耀州）、杭州官窑和早期景德镇青瓷之间观察到有趣的联系，这可以暂时解释为宋朝在公元1127年飞往杭州，可能还带着皇家陶工。龙泉青瓷包含大量的窑片，由尼尔斯·帕姆格伦在1936年访问该地区时获得。真实的窑炉材料的可用性在西方这类研究中是非常不寻常的，并且特别注意这些数据。希望对龙泉周边的命名窑（丽水、歧口、元口、龙峰、金村、大窑、安福、保定、温州）进行区分，并证明对保定、温州产品进行化学区分是可能的。这些窑在地理上与龙泉本身略有距离，可能更早，它们的成分似乎介于浙江越器和真正的龙泉青瓷之间。其他窑被证明很难区分，观察到的微小差异可能是由于日期或织物质量的差异。
The results of over 130 chemical analyses of Chinese Greenware bodies are presented, obtained by atomic absorption spectrometry. A clear chemical difference is seen between the earlier Northern Zhejiang Yue wares and the later Longquan celadons. Interesting connections are observed between Northern Celadons (assumed to be from Yaozhou), Hangzhou Guan wares and early Jingdezhen Greenwares, which are tentatively explained by the flight of the Song court to Hangzhou in AD 1127, perhaps taking Imperial potters with them. The Longquan celadons contained a substantial number of kiln sherds, obtained by Nils Palmgren on his visit to the area in 1936. The availability of authentic kiln material is very unusual in Western studies of this kind, and particular attention is paid to these data. It was hoped to discriminate between the named kilns around Longquan (Lishui, Qikou, Yuankou, Longfeng, Jincun, Dayao, Anfu, Baoding and Wenzhou), and it proved possible to distinguish chemically the Baoding and Wenzhou products. These kilns are geographically slightly removed from Longquan itself, are probably earlier in date, and their composition appears to be intermediate between the Yue wares of Zhejiang province and the true Longquan celadons. The other kilns proved difficult to distinguish, and observed small differences are probably due to differences in date or fabric quality.