COMPARISON OF THE AUDITEC AND RINTELMANN RECORDINGS OF THE NU-6
COMPARISON OF THE AUDITEC AND RINTELMANN RECORDINGS OF THE NU-6
复制标题
DOI：
10.1044/jshd.4903.267
复制
发表时间：
1984-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
CRAIG, CH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FRANK, T;CRAIG, CH
使用Auditec和Rintelmann记录的NU-6在60和70 dB SPL [声压级]下安静和在信噪比（S/N）为+12，6，0和-6 dB的多人噪声背景中获得了30名听力正常的[人类]听众的单词辨别分数。这样做是为了获得规范性数据，并确定是否这2个录音相同的单词列表是在安静和嘈杂的背景下，在对话水平是等同的。在60和70 dB SPL时，安静和每个S/N比下每个记录的单词辨别分数没有显著差异。然而，随着S/N比变得更严重，单词辨别分数显着更差;在每个S/N比下，Auditec记录获得的分数显着低于Rintelmann记录获得的分数。使用Auditec和Rintelmann录音的单词辨别分数之间的差异主要归因于测试单词的记录水平，其次归因于载体短语和说话者的差异。
Word discrimination scores were obtained for 30 normally hearing [human] listeners using Auditec and Rintelmann recordings of the NU-6 presented at 60 and 70 dB SPL [sound pressure level] in quite and in a background of multitalker noise at signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios of +12, 6, 0 and -6 dB. This was done to obtain normative data and to determine whether these 2 recordings of the same word lists were equivalent at conversational levels in quiet and in a noisy background. The word discrimination scores for each recording in quiet and at each S/N ratio were not significantly different when presented at 60 and 70 dB SPL. However, the word discrimination scores were significantly poorer as the S/N ratio became more severe; the scores obtained with the Auditec recording were significantly poorer than those obtained with the Rintelmann recording at each S/N ratio. The differences between word discrimination scores using the Auditec and Rintelmann recordings were primarily attributed to the recorded level of the test word and secondarily attributed to carrier phrase and talker differences.