FREQUENCY-SELECTIVITY IN NORMALLY-HEARING AND HEARING-IMPAIRED OBSERVERS

FREQUENCY-SELECTIVITY IN NORMALLY-HEARING AND HEARING-IMPAIRED OBSERVERS
复制标题

DOI:
10.1044/jshr.2303.646
复制
发表时间:
1980-01-01
期刊:
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
ZWICKER, E
ZWICKER, E
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
FLORENTINE, M;BUUS, S;ZWICKER, E

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

用4种不同的方法测量频率选择性,比较听力正常的人与传导性(非耳硬化)、耳硬化、噪声诱发或退行性听力损失的人。每一类损失由7-10名观察员代表,他们在500和4000赫兹的中心频率下进行测试。对每组进行4项测量:心理声学调谐曲线、窄带掩蔽、双音掩蔽和响度和。频率选择性在存在耳蜗听力损失的频率处降低。无论测试水平如何,听力正常的观察者和耳蜗受损的观察者进行比较,频率选择性都降低了。4项频率选择性指标均显著相关。频率选择性降低与耳蜗听力损失呈正相关。
Frequency selectivity, as measured by 4 different methods, was compared in observers human with normal hearing and in observers with conductive (nonotosclerotic), otosclerotic, noise-induced, or degenerative hearing losses. Each category of loss was represented by 7-10 observers, who were tested at center frequencies of 500 and 4000 Hz. For each group, the following 4 measurements were made: psychoacoustical tuning curves, narrow-band masking, 2-tone masking and loudness summation. Frequency selectivity was reduced at frequencies where a cochlear hearing loss was present. Frequency selectivity was reduced regardless of the test level at which normally-hearing observers and observers with cochlear impairment were compared. All 4 measures of frequency selectivity were significantly correlated. Reduced frequency selectivity was positively correlated with the amount of cochlear hearing loss.