Hemodynamic effects of intracranial aneurysms from stent-induced straightening of parent vessels by stent-assisted coiling embolization
Hemodynamic effects of intracranial aneurysms from stent-induced straightening of parent vessels by stent-assisted coiling embolization
复制标题
通过支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞支架诱导载瘤血管伸直对颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学影响。
DOI:
10.1177/1591019921995334
复制
发表时间:
2021-02-27
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Xiang, Jianping
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Leng, Xiaochang;Wan, Hailin;Xiang, Jianping
Background Straightening of parent vessels happens for stent-assisted coiling embolization (SACE) treatment of intracranial aneurysms. This study aims to investigate aneurysmal hemodynamic modifications caused by stent-induced vessel straightening. Methods Stent and coil deployments of a SACE-treated distal bifurcation aneurysm by finite element method were performed first with the preoperative (not straightened, NS) and postoperative (straightened, S) vessel models respectively. Computational fluid dynamics were then performed for eight models, including (I) NS only model, (II) NS+stent model, (III) NS+coils model, (IV) NS+stent+coils model, (V) S only model, (VI) S+stent model, (VII) S+coils model, and (VIII) S+stent+coils model. Finally, changes in aneurysmal flow velocity, isovelocity surface and wall shear stress (WSS) were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Results The flow was less in the S models than that in the corresponding NS models. Coils blocked most of the flow into the aneurysm sac in both NS models and S models and vessel straightening had more profound effect on the high aneurysmal flow volume reduction than coiling, while stenting generated adverse effect on flow reduction. Taking the NS only model as baseline (100%), the sac-averaged velocities of models II to VIII were 112%, 36%, 42%, 45%, 39%, 12%, 13%, and high flow volumes were 119%, 21%, 30%, 10%, 8%, 3%, 3%, while the sac-averaged WSSs were 106%, 37%, 44%, 41%, 35%, 17% and 24%, respectively. Conclusions Stent-induced vessel straightening combined coil embolization has the best performance in hemodynamic modifications and may reduce the recurrence rate, whereas stenting may generate adverse effect on hemodynamic alterations.