Dendritic Cells in Cardiovascular Diseases Epiphenomenon, Contributor, or Therapeutic Opportunity
Dendritic Cells in Cardiovascular Diseases Epiphenomenon, Contributor, or Therapeutic Opportunity
复制标题
DOI:
10.1161/circulationaha.113.003364
复制
发表时间:
2013-12-17
期刊:
影响因子:
37.8
通讯作者:
Biessen, Erik A. L.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Christ, Anette;Temmerman, Lieve;Biessen, Erik A. L.
As an indirect measure of DCs' association with CVD, DC numbers and functionality have been evaluated in the blood of patients with CVD, such as coronary and peripheral artery disease. 15 In 2006, van Vre and coworkers were the first to describe a marked decrease in circulating DCs (circulating cDCs and pDCs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), defined by angiography as> 50% stenosis in≥ 1coronary arteries. 16 Until now, several studies confirmed a significant decrease in blood DCs (cDCs and pDCs) in CAD patients, irrespective of CAD grade (stable versus unstable angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction), number of diseased vessels, or subset markers used for DC enumeration. 15, 17–23 In sharp contrast, Shi and colleagues24 reported increased circulating cDCs and unaltered pDC numbers in patients with stable CAD. By investigating the distribution of circulating DCs in patients with different stages of peripheral arterial disease, including patients with intermittent claudication and critical limb ischemia, Dopheide and coworkers25 showed that blood cDC numbers were increased, whereas pDC numbers were reduced in patients who had peripheral arterial disease in comparison with healthy controls. Of note, both cDCs and pDCs from patients who have critical limb ischemia revealed an immature phenotype, suggesting that severe ischemia and prolonged inflammation in this ailment might lead to an attenuation in the proinflammatory membrane patterns of circulating DC subsets.In general, most patient studies show declined blood DC numbers in CAD patients. Inconsistent results may be explained by differences in the extent and localization of disease, the timing of blood sampling (before/after a surgical intervention; lesion onset versus progression), the prevalence of risk factors across the patients included in these studies, and the cohort sizes consulted.