Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali’s Transnationalism: Pan-Islamism, Colonialism, and Radical Politics
Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali’s Transnationalism: Pan-Islamism, Colonialism, and Radical Politics
复制标题
毛拉纳·巴卡图拉·博帕利的跨国主义：泛伊斯兰主义、殖民主义和激进政治
DOI：
10.1057/9781137387042_8
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Humayun Ansari
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Humayun Ansari
在过去的两个世纪里，穆斯林对西方霸权的挑战在最近几年受到了学术界的极大关注。这反过来又引起了人们对他们作为抵抗帝国主义的标志的日益浓厚的兴趣，从19世纪中叶到第二次世界大战后非殖民化的开始。在所谓的穆斯林世界的许多地区，这种反抗伪装成了泛伊斯兰主义的幌子，这种泛伊斯兰主义以大规模动员的形式出现在政治舞台上，比如两次世界大战早期印度的希拉法特运动(1919-1924)。这些事态发展引发了人们对这场泛伊斯兰运动重要性的质疑。毫不奇怪，出现了截然不同的观点，一些人认为，这场运动对西方构成了严重威胁，而另一些人则认为，当代政治监督机构对其严重性的坚持，在很大程度上是对神经的攻击。事实上，就第二种反应而言，目标人群似乎经常对泛伊斯兰领导人的著作和节目持谚语中的“盐粒”，并对他们的激进主义持怀疑态度，而殖民当局往往夸大了他们的影响。
Muslim challenges to Western hegemony over the past two centuries have received much scholarly attention in recent years. This, in turn, has generated growing interest in their role as a marker of resistance to imperialism, stretching from the middle of the nineteenth century to the beginning of decolonization following World War II. In many parts of the so-called Muslim world, this defiance assumed the guise of Pan-Islamism, which burst onto the political scene in the form of mass mobilizations such as that associated with the Khilafat Movement in India (1919–1924) during the early interwar period. Such developments raised the question of the significance of this Pan-Islamic movement. Not surprisingly, contrasting perspectives have emerged, some arguing that the movement posed a serious threat to the West, while others have judged this insistence by contemporary agents of political surveillance on its severity to be largely an attack of the nerves. Indeed, as far as this second response is concerned, it would seem that target populations often took the writings and programs of Pan-Islamic leaders with a proverbial “grain of salt” and were skeptical of their radicalism, while colonial authorities tended to overinflate their impact.