Gone But Not Lost: Implications for Estimating HIV Care Outcomes When Loss to Clinic Is Not Loss to Care.
Gone But Not Lost: Implications for Estimating HIV Care Outcomes When Loss to Clinic Is Not Loss to Care.
复制标题
消失但不会丢失:当损失诊所的损失不是护理时,估计艾滋病毒护理结果的影响。
DOI:
10.1097/ede.0000000000001201
复制
发表时间:
2020-07
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Edmonds A
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Edwards JK;Lesko CR;Herce ME;Murenzi G;Twizere C;Lelo P;Anastos K;Tymejczyk O;Yotebieng M;Nash D;Adedimeji A;Edmonds A
In some time-to-event analyses, it is unclear whether loss to follow-up should be treated as a censoring event or a competing event. Such ambiguity is particularly common in HIV research that uses routinely collected clinical data to report the timing of key milestones along the HIV care continuum. In this setting, loss to follow-up may be viewed as a censoring event, under the assumption that patients who are “lost” from a study clinic immediately enroll in care elsewhere, or a competing event, under the assumption that people “lost” are out of care all together. We illustrate an approach to address this ambiguity when estimating the 2-year risk of antiretroviral treatment initiation among 19,506 people living with HIV who enrolled in the IeDEA Central Africa cohort between 2006 and 2017, along with published estimates from tracing studies in Africa. We also assessed the finite sample properties of the proposed approach using simulation experiments. The estimated 2-year risk of treatment initiation was 69% if patients were censored at loss to follow-up or 59% if losses to follow-up were treated as competing events. Using the proposed approach, we estimated that the 2-year risk of ART initiation was 62% (95% confidence interval: 61, 62). The proposed approach had little bias and appropriate confidence interval coverage under scenarios examined in the simulation experiments. The proposed approach relaxes the assumptions inherent in treating loss to follow-up as a censoring or competing event in clinical HIV cohort studies.