PYRITE OXIDATION AND REDUCTION - MOLECULAR-ORBITAL THEORY CONSIDERATIONS
PYRITE OXIDATION AND REDUCTION - MOLECULAR-ORBITAL THEORY CONSIDERATIONS
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/0016-7037(87)90127-x
复制
发表时间:
1987-12-01
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
LUTHER, GW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
LUTHER, GW
It is possible to demonstrate a heterogeneous reaction mechanism for both pyrite oxidation and reduction using a molecular orbital theory approach. The mechanism demonstrates that attachment to the FeS 2 surface by an oxidant or reductant requires that they have a vacant orbital (solution phase) or site (solid phase) to bind the oxidant or reductant to a sulfur from S 2− 2 in FeS 2. The approach thus requires the formation of a persulfido (disulfide) bridge between the iron in pyrite and the oxidant (eg Fe 3+) or the reductant (eg Cr 2+). The first electron transfer in oxidation occurs from the π∗; orbital (highest occupied molecular orbital, HOMO) of the S 2− 2 in FeS 2 to the π orbital (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, LUMO) of the oxidant. Electron transfer in reduction occurs from the σ∗ orbital (HOMO) of the reductant to the σ∗ orbital (LUMO) of the S 2− 2 in FeS 2. The bridge formation between two metals by a common ligand (persulfido), and the electron transfer, is consistent with an inner sphere type mechanism. In FeS 2, however, the ligand S 2− 2 acts as the electron source or sink rather the Fe 2+. The strength of the sulfur-sulfur bond in the persulfido bridge after electron transfer is key to the understanding of FeS 2 oxidation and reduction. Additional bridges can be formed on the FeS 2 surface during oxidation until the initial oxidation product S 2 O 2− 3 is produced. The proposed mechanism allows for facile pyrite oxidation by Fe 3+ but not O 2. This is consistent with experimental observations. The mechanism does not require the formation of a free radical in solution. It does predict the formation of an ion radical on the pyrite surface. The proposed mechanism gives the same initial intermediate (FeS 2 O) as recently proposed by Moses et al.(1987), but explains possible surface attachment by an oxidant and subsequent FeS 2 oxidation using a molecular orbital theory approach. The proposed surface mechanism is consistent with experimental observations of several investigators (Goldhaber, 1983; McKibben and Barnes, 1986; Wiersma and Rimstidt, 1984). The importance of thiosulfate formation and reactivity with Fe 3+ is discussed in light of pyrite oxidation and of previous reports on the presence of thiosulfate in marine porewaters