Gypsy Justice versus Gorgio Law: Interrelations of Difference
Gypsy Justice versus Gorgio Law: Interrelations of Difference
复制标题
吉普赛正义与戈尔吉奥法律：差异的相互关系
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-954x.2005.00591.x
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Okely
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Okely
这篇文章与弗兰肯伯格产生了共鸣，探讨了个人陌生人/局外人的角色。非吉普赛人(戈尔吉奥)个人或系统经常被用来解决旅行者-吉普赛人之间的内部纠纷，尽管很少像弗兰肯伯格的研究那样扮演相对良性的角色。局外人的制度，虽然代表了数百年的固步主义和种族主义迫害，但也可能受到操纵。虽然流行的话语将吉普赛人的不识字系统描述为某种潜在进化中的孤立系统，但关于吉普赛人解决冲突的少数研究在其他学科中引起了关注，因为它们提出了关于后工业化社会的替代控制和地方合作的问题。这篇文章不是任何经典的对比和比较，而是以执法机关和执法机构为资源，展示了不同的相互关系。我的民族志材料不是来自前殖民地，而是曾经的大英帝国中心。旅行者-吉普赛人也有相对独立、适当的解决冲突的手段。到目前为止，这些详细的材料来自当地的田野调查，而不是来自遥远的地方，为了安全地度过一段时间，一直被扣留。它可能已经变得更加相关。
Resonating with Frankenberg, this article explores the role of the individual stranger/outsider. The non-Gypsy (gorgio) individual or system is often used to settle internal disputes among Traveller-Gypsies, although rarely in the relatively benign role, as in Frankenberg's study. The outsider's system, while representing centuries of sedentarist and racist persecution, may also be open to manipulation. While popular discourse represents the Gypsies’ non-literate system as an isolate in some potential evolution, the few studies of Gypsies’ resolution of conflict have attracted attention in other disciplines because they raise questions about alternative controls and local cooperation in post-industrialist societies. Rather than any classical contrast and comparison, the article demonstrates inter relations of differences with emphasis on agency and institutions of law enforcement as a resource. My ethnographic material emerges not from former colonies but the once centre of the British Empire. The Traveller-Gypsies also have relatively independent, appropriate means of settling conflicts. Hitherto, this detailed material from localized fieldwork rather than from afar, has been withheld for a safe passage of time. It may have become even more relevant.