Examining learning from text and pictures for different task types: Does the multimedia effect differ for conceptual, causal, and procedural tasks?
Examining learning from text and pictures for different task types: Does the multimedia effect differ for conceptual, causal, and procedural tasks?
复制标题
检查不同任务类型的文本和图片学习:对于概念性任务、因果性任务和程序性任务,多媒体效果是否不同?
DOI:
10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.028
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
9.9
通讯作者:
Anne Schüler
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. V. Genuchten;K. Scheiter;Anne Schüler
The multimedia effect (ME) is a well-researched effect in the field of learning and instruction. In this article, two views that explain the ME are compared. The outcome-oriented view focuses on the beneficial effect of text and pictures on mental representations, whereas the process-oriented view focuses on the beneficial effect of text and pictures for information processing. To contrast these views, the ME sizes for different task types were compared (i.e., conceptual, causal, procedural tasks). Whereas the outcome-oriented view predicts no differences in ME size, the process-oriented view predicts that the ME is largest in causal tasks, smaller in procedural tasks, and smallest in conceptual tasks. Sixty-five students learnt with text only or with text and pictures. Task type and information source (i.e., whether the text, picture, or text and picture provided the answer to a post-test question) were varied within subjects. The results showed that, in line with the process-oriented view, the ME was smaller for conceptual tasks than for procedural tasks. Contrary to the expectations, the ME was larger in procedural tasks than in causal tasks. Moreover, the pattern of results varied with information source. Research and practical implications are described, so that pictures can be deployed optimally.