QUEER DOMICIDE LGBT Displacement and Home Loss in Natural i'Disaster Impact, Response, and Recovery
QUEER DOMICIDE LGBT Displacement and Home Loss in Natural i'Disaster Impact, Response, and Recovery
复制标题
DOI：
10.2752/175174214x13891916944751
复制
发表时间：
2014-07-01
期刊：
影响因子：
0.4
通讯作者：
Dominey-Howes, Dale
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gorman-Murray, Andrew;McKinnon, Scott;Dominey-Howes, Dale
这篇文章探讨了女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人（LGBT）在面对自然灾害时流离失所、失去家园和重建的经历。在灾难研究中，LGBT的脆弱性和恢复力很少被研究；这篇文章开始填补这一空白，关注LGBT家庭在灾难中是如何“不造”的。为了做到这一点，我们批判性地阅读了一系列学术和媒体评论，这些评论是关于2004- 2012年在不同背景下的自然灾害中的lgbt经历，包括南亚、美国、海地和日本。此外，利用2011年澳大利亚布里斯班和新西兰克赖斯特彻奇灾难中LGBT经历试点工作的初步数据。我们发现，灾害影响是性和性别少数群体持续存在的问题的第一阶段。灾难破坏了LGBT的住所和社区，但应对和恢复策略倾向于帮助异性恋核心家庭，而忽略了LGBT幸存者的关注和需求。灾难的影响、应对和恢复“破坏”了LGBT的家庭和归属感，或者在从住所到社区的多个尺度上抑制了家庭生活。我们关注三个尺度或地点：首先，个人住宅的破坏，以及流离失所和重建的问题；第二，对临时庇护所中个人和家庭的隐私和歧视的担忧；第三，LGBT社区和社区基础设施（如休闲场所和组织设施）的丧失和重建。
This article examines lesbian, gay bisexual, and trans (LGBT) experiences of displacement, home loss, and rebuilding in the face of natural disasters. LGBT vulnerability and resilience are little studied in disaster reserch; this article begins to fill this gap,fiocusing on LGBT domicide how LGBT homes are "unmade" in disasters. TO do this, we critically read a range of scholarly, and media commentaries on LGBT-experiences of naturildisasters in varioui"settings over 2004-12, including South Asic6he USA, Haiti, and Japan. Additionally, utilize preliminary data from pilot work on LGBT experiences of 2011 disasters in Brisbane, Australia, and Christchurch, New Zealand. We find that disaster impacts are the first stage of ongoing problems for sexual and gender minorities. Disaster impacts destroy LGBT residences and neighborhoods, but response and recovery strategies favor assistance for heterosexual nuclear families and elide the concerns and needs of LGBT survivors. Disaster impact, response, and recovery "unmakes" LGBT home and belonging, or inhibits homemaking, at multiple scales, from the residence to the neighborhood. We focus on three scales or sites: first, destruction of individual residences, and problems with displacement and rebuilding; second, concerns about privacy and discrimination for individuals and families in temporary shelters; and third, loss and rebuilding of LGBT neighborhoods and community infrastructure (e.g. leisure venues and organizational facilities).