The Association between Breakfast Skipping and Body Weight, Nutrient Intake, and Metabolic Measures among Participants with Metabolic Syndrome.

The Association between Breakfast Skipping and Body Weight, Nutrient Intake, and Metabolic Measures among Participants with Metabolic Syndrome.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/nu9040384
复制
发表时间:
2017-04-14
期刊:
影响因子:
5.9
通讯作者:
Ma Y
Ma Y
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang L;Cordeiro LS;Liu J;Ma Y

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

不吃早餐对健康的影响,尤其是对成年人的影响,仍然是一个有争议的话题。对240名患有代谢综合征(METS)的参与者进行了二次数据分析,以检验早餐饮食模式与体重减轻、营养摄入量和代谢参数之间的关系。在基线和一年的访问中,从每个参与者中随机选择了三个24小时饮食回忆。不吃早餐的比例在基线时为32.9%,在一年内为17.4%。在基线,在调整了人口统计学和体力活动后,吃早餐的参与者的硫胺素、烟酸和叶酸的摄入量高于不吃早餐的参与者(p<0.05);其他选定的参数包括体重、饮食质量评分、营养素摄入量和代谢参数在两组之间没有显著差异(p≥0.05)。从基线到一年,在调整协变量后,不吃早餐的人的平均脂肪摄入量增加了2.7%(95%可信区间:−1.0,6.5%),而不吃早餐的人的平均脂肪摄入量下降了1.2%(95%可信区间:−3.4%,1.1%)(p=0.02)。其他选定参数的平均变化在不吃早餐的人和吃早餐的人之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。这项研究不支持这样的假设,即不吃早餐会影响患有METS的参与者的体重、营养摄入量和选定的代谢指标。
The effect of skipping breakfast on health, especially in adults, remains a controversial topic. A secondary data analysis was conducted to examine associations between breakfast eating patterns and weight loss, nutrient intake, and metabolic parameters among participants with metabolic syndrome (MetS) (n = 240). Three randomly selected 24-h dietary recalls were collected from each participant at baseline and at the one-year visit. Skipped breakfast was seen in 32.9% at baseline and in 17.4% at the one-year visit, respectively. At baseline, after adjustment for demographics and physical activity, participants who ate breakfast had a higher thiamin, niacin, and folate intake than did breakfast skippers (p < 0.05); other selected parameters including body weight, dietary quality scores, nutrient intake, and metabolic parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups (p ≥ 0.05). From baseline to one year, after adjustment for covariates, mean fat intake increased by 2.7% (95% confidence intervals (CI): −1.0, 6.5%) of total energy in breakfast skippers in comparison to the 1.2% decrease observed in breakfast eaters (95% CI: −3.4, 1.1%) (p = 0.02). Mean changes in other selected parameters showed no significant differences between breakfast skippers and eaters (p > 0.05). This study did not support the hypothesis that skipping breakfast has impact on body weight, nutrient intakes, and selected metabolic measures in participants with MetS.