Facilitating Research Cooperation through Linking and Sharing of Heterogenous Research Artifacts

Facilitating Research Cooperation through Linking and Sharing of Heterogenous Research Artifacts
复制标题

通过异构研究成果的链接和共享促进研究合作

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
International Conference on Semantic Systems
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
I. Lütkebohle
I. Lütkebohle
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Florian Lier;Frederic H. K. Siepmann;Thilo Paul;S. Wrede;Sven Wachsmuth;I. Lütkebohle

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

研究人员和其他知识工作者经常生产和使用各种研究人工制品,如论文、数据集、实验规范、软件等。软件的哪个版本用于特定论文),从而产生不必要的工作和潜在的错误。语义网技术可以提供元数据,以及明确的,具体的链接之间的文物。然而,数据获取和感知效用是采用的潜在绊脚石。因此,我们提出了一个系统,这是专注于集成和增强现有的数据(从而保护现有的投资),并检查它使用面向交互的角度来看,用户没有语义Web的经验。具体来说,我们首先研究的目标群体的要求,然后提出了一个探索性的研究管理与以软件为中心的项目的研究文物。结果证实,不同的数据源是共同使用的,重用现有的存储库被认为是有效的(例如,更方便、更短的循环时间),并且实验的聚集体被认为是功能相关的。此外,质量保证机制的一体化,如持续一体化,被认为是有益的,尽管有一些额外的努力。
Researchers and other knowledge workers frequently produce and use diverse research artefacts such as papers, data sets, experiment specifications, software, etc. In this, they are often faced with unclear relationships (e.g., which version of a software was in use for a particular paper), creating unnecessary work and potentially errors. Semantic web technologies can provide metadata as well as explicit, specific links between the artefacts. However, data acquisition and perceived utility are potential stumbling blocks for adoption. Therefore, we propose a system which is focused on integrating and augmenting existing data (thus protecting the existing investment), and examine it using an interaction-oriented perspective, on users without semantic web experience. Specifically, we first study requirements of the target group and then present an exploratory study of managing research artefacts related to software-centric projects. The results confirm that diverse data sources are in common use, that re-using existing repositories is perceived as efficient (e.g., more convenient, shorter cycle time), and that the experimented aggregates are perceived as functionally relevant. Furthermore, the integration of quality assurance mechanisms, such as continuous integration, is perceived as beneficial, despite some added effort.