Why Does a Universal Anti-Bullying Program Not Help All Children? Explaining Persistent Victimization During an Intervention
Why Does a Universal Anti-Bullying Program Not Help All Children? Explaining Persistent Victimization During an Intervention
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11121-018-0906-5
复制
发表时间：
2018-08-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Veenstra, Rene
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kaufman, Tessa M. L.;Kretschmer, Tina;Veenstra, Rene
虽然反欺凌干预措施往往是有效的，但一些儿童继续成为受害者。为了增加对可能阻碍儿童从反欺凌干预中受益的潜在因素的了解，我们研究了基于群体的反欺凌干预过程中受害轨迹个体差异的潜在原因。数据来自五波调查9122名儿童（7 - 12岁; 2 - 5年级）谁参加了KiVa反欺凌干预（n = 6142）或在对照学校（n = 2980名儿童）。干预样本中发现了三个轨迹，代表经历稳定高，减少或稳定低/无受害的儿童。高和低轨迹的双轨迹模型最能代表控制样本。干预样本的多项式回归显示，儿童经历了特别高水平的同伴拒绝，内化问题，和低质量的亲子关系减少受害，因此这些特点似乎有助于持续受害。研究结果要求在干预措施中采取有针对性的战略，以减少更多儿童的受害情况。
Although anti-bullying interventions are often effective, some children continue to be victimized. To increase knowledge of potential factors that might impede children's benefiting from an anti-bullying intervention, we examined potential reasons for individual differences in victimization trajectories during a group-based anti-bullying intervention. Data stem from a five-wave survey among 9122 children (7-12 years old; grades 2-5) who participated in the KiVa anti-bullying intervention (n = 6142) or were in control schools (n = 2980 children). Three trajectories were found in the intervention sample, representing children who experienced stable high, decreasing, or stable low/no victimization. A two-trajectory model of high and low trajectories represented the control sample best. Multinomial regressions on the intervention sample showed that children who experienced particularly high levels of peer rejection, internalizing problems, and lower quality parent-child relationships decreased less in victimization; thus these characteristics appeared to contribute to persistent victimization. The results call for tailored strategies in interventions aiming to reduce victimization for more children.