Standardization of the Korean Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure
Standardization of the Korean Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure
复制标题
DOI：
10.4306/pi.2008.5.4.232
复制
发表时间：
2008-12-01
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Woo, Jong Inn
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kim, Ji Yang;Park, Joon Hyuk;Woo, Jong Inn
目的编制韩国版老年抑郁量表（GDS-KR），并对其信度、效度和因素结构进行检验。我们还估计了其最佳的截止分数为重度抑郁症（MDD）和轻度抑郁症（MnDD）分层的年龄和education.Methods GDS-KR 888主题（61例MDD患者，45 MnDD患者，和782名正常老年人）。检验了量表的内部一致性和重测信度。同时用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表（CES-D-K）和汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAM-D）的Pearson相关系数评价其效度。比较MDD患者、MnDD患者和正常老年人的GDS-KR评分，评价其判别效度。为了评估其结构效度，进行方差最大旋转的主成分分析。结果GDS-KR的Chronbach’s系数α为0.90，重测信度为0.91（p
Objective We developed a Revised Korean version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-KR) and examined its reliability, validity, and factor structures. We also estimated its optimal cutoff scores for major depressive disorder (MDD) and minor depressive disorder (MnDD) stratified by age and education.Methods The GDS-KR was administered to 888 Subjects (61 MDD patients, 45 MnDD patients, and 782 normal elders). Its internal consistency and test-retest reliability were examined. Its concurrent validity was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients with the Korean version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-K) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The mean GDS-KR scores of the MDD patients, MnDD patients and normal elders were compared to evaluate its discriminant validity. To evaluate its construct validity, a principal component analysis with varimax rotation was performed. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate its diagnostic ability.Results Chronbach's coefficient alpha for the GDS-KR was 0.90 and the test-retest reliability was 0.91 (p