Bandura's exercise self-efficacy scale: Validation in an Australian cardiac rehabilitation setting
Bandura's exercise self-efficacy scale: Validation in an Australian cardiac rehabilitation setting
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.016
复制
发表时间：
2009-06-01
影响因子：
8.1
通讯作者：
Davidson, Patricia M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Everett, Bronwyn;Salamonson, Yenna;Davidson, Patricia M.
背景资料：尽管心脏康复（CR）在改善心血管疾病患者的健康结局方面具有既定的益处，但在推荐水平下坚持定期体力活动仍然不是最佳的。自我效能已被证明是一个重要的调解人的健康行为，包括exercise.Objective.To评估的心理测量性质班杜拉的运动自我效能（ESE）规模在澳大利亚CR设置。设计：验证研究。设置：心脏康复。参与者：110例患者（平均值：60.11，S.D.：方法：参与者完成了6分钟步行试验（6MWT）和班杜拉的运动自我效能量表在注册和完成了6周CR programmes.Results：班杜拉的ESE量表有一个单因素结构，具有较高的内部一致性（0.95），并表现出没有地板或天花板的影响。通过6MWT步行距离对ESE评分进行比较，发现基线时记录超过500 m的患者的ESE评分显著较高（平均值：116.26，S.D.：32.02 m）的患者（平均值：89.94，S.D.：29.47 m）（p = 0.044）。一个积极的和显着的相关性在ESE规模的分数变化和6MWT距离的变化（r = 0.28，p = 0.035）之间被seeed.Conclusions：ESE规模是一个强大的措施，运动自我效能的范围内参加这个门诊心脏康复计划的患者。改善自我效能的干预措施可能会增加CR患者定期体力活动的效能。(C)2009爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
Background: Despite the established benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in improving health outcomes for people with cardiovascular disease, adherence to regular physical activity at recommended levels remains suboptimal. Self-efficacy has been shown to be an important mediator of health behaviour, including exercise.Objectives: To assess the psychometric properties of Bandura's exercise self-efficacy (ESE) scale in an Australian CR setting.Design: Validation study.Setting: Cardiac rehabilitation.Participants: One hundred and ten patients (Mean: 60.11, S.D.: 10.57 years).Methods: Participants completed a six-minute walk test (6MWT) and Bandura's exercise self-efficacy scale at enrolment and on completion of a 6-week CR program.Results: Bandura's ESE scale had a single factor structure with high internal consistency (0.95), and demonstrated no floor or ceiling effects. A comparison of ESE scores by distance walked on 6MWT indicated those who recorded more than 500 m at baseline had significantly higher ESE scores (Mean: 116.26, S.D.: 32.02 m) than those patients who only achieved Lip to 400 m on the 6MWT at baseline (Mean: 89.94, S.D.: 29.47 m) (p = 0.044). A positive and significant correlation between the change in scores on the ESE scale and the change in the 6MWT distance (r = 0.28, p = 0.035) was seen.Conclusions: The ESE scale was a robust measure of exercise self-efficacy over the range of patients attending this outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program. Interventions to improve self-efficacy may increase CR patient's efficacy for regular physical activity. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.