Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition.

Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037//0278-7393.22.1.48
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Mark S. Seidenberg;A. Petersen;M. MacDonald;D. Plaut
Mark S. Seidenberg;A. Petersen;M. MacDonald;D. Plaut
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mark S. Seidenberg;A. Petersen;M. MacDonald;D. Plaut

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

两个实验研究了影响假同音异义词(非单词,如brone或joap,听起来像单词)和非假同音异义词(如brone和joap,听起来不像单词)处理的因素。在实验1中,假同音同义词比非假同音同义词产生更快的命名潜伏期和更慢的词汇决策潜伏期,这与R. S. McCann和D. Besner(1987)以及R. S. McCann, D. Besner和E. Davelaar(1988)的结果相同。影响的大小与受试者的词汇决策速度有关,但与命名无关。实验2采用即时命名条件和延迟命名条件。再次有一个显著的假同音效应,在不同的条件下,其大小没有变化。这些结果表明,在词汇决定和命名任务中的假同音字效应具有不同的基础。在词汇决策中,它们反映了假同音词对与单词相关的语音和语义信息的激活。在命名方面,他们反映了熟悉的发音和不熟悉的发音在发音难易程度上的差异。这些结果对单词识别模型的影响进行了讨论,重点是在不包含单词特定表示的模型中如何产生假同音字效应,例如M. S. Seidenberg和J. L. McClelland(1989)模型。
Two experiments examined factors that influence the processing of pseudohomophones (nonwords such as brone or joap, which sound like words) and nonpseudohomophones (such as brone and joap, which do not sound like words). In Experiment 1, pseudohomophones yielded faster naming latencies and slower lexical-decision latencies than did nonpseudohomophones, replicating results of R. S. McCann and D. Besner (1987) and R. S. McCann, D. Besner, and E. Davelaar (1988). The magnitude of the effect was related to subjects' speed in lexical decision but not naming. In Experiment 2, both immediate and delayed naming conditions were used. There was again a significant pseudohomophone effect that did not change in magnitude across conditions. These results indicate that pseudohomophone effects in the lexical-decision and naming tasks have different bases. In lexical decision, they reflect the pseudohomophone's activation of phonological and semantic information associated with words. In naming, they reflect differences in ease of articulating familiar versus unfamiliar pronunciations. Implications of these results concerning models of word recognition are discussed, focusing on how pseudohomophone effects can arise within models that do not incorporate word-specific representations, such as the M. S. Seidenberg and J. L. McClelland (1989) model.