Sverdlovsk and Yellow Rain: Two Cases of Soviet Noncompliance?
Sverdlovsk and Yellow Rain: Two Cases of Soviet Noncompliance?
复制标题
斯维尔德洛夫斯克和黄雨：苏联不遵守规定的两个案例？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1987
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Harris
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Harris
1981年11月10日，美国国务院政治军事事务主任理查德·伯特对参议院外交关系委员会说：“在过去五年，甚至更长时间里，武器被人类取缔，在工业化世界的战场上被成功禁止了50多年，被用来对付未经世故和手无寸铁的人，在老挝、柬埔寨[柬埔寨]，以及最近在阿富汗正在进行的越来越多的灭绝运动中。”在里根政府看来，苏联直接卷入了这些令人发指的活动。这一东南亚和阿富汗化学战的指控一直是美国政府针对苏联违反军控规定的案件的核心。它在美国过去几年发布的众多不遵守报告中得到了突出的关注。*它在各种出版物中得到了大力重复
o n November 10, 1981, Richard Burt, director of politico-military affairs at the Department of State, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: “Over the past five years, and perhaps longer, weapons outlawed by mankind, weapons successfully banned from the battlefields of the industrialized world for over five decades, have been used against unsophisticated and defenseless people, in campaigns of mounting extermination which are being conducted in Laos, Kampuchea [Cambodia], and, more recently, in Afghanistan.”’ In the view of the Reagan Administration, the Soviet Union was directly involved in these heinous activities. This charge of chemical warfare in Southeast Asia and Afghanistan has been at the center of the Administration’s arms control noncompliance case against the Soviet Union. It has received prominent attention in the numerous noncompliance reports that the United States has released over the past several years.* And it has been vigorously repeated in publications ranging