Introduction to the Special Issue: Bisexual Health: Unpacking the Paradox.
Introduction to the Special Issue: Bisexual Health: Unpacking the Paradox.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/15299716.2012.674849
复制
发表时间:
2012-01-01
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Dodge B
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schick V;Dodge B
Although bisexuality has often been subsumed under the label of “homosexuality” and, for a number of reasons, remains rather secretive, the recent documentation of the mental and physical health discrepancies that exist between bisexually identified men/women and their counterparts has triggered an upsurge in research focused on bisexual populations (Boehmer, 2002; Dodge & Sandfort, 2007; Kaestle & Ivory, 2012). As such, health concerns continue to drive a large portion of the research on bisexual populations. Although research focused directly on the needs of bisexual men and women is a welcome addition to the literature, the emphasis on health disparities has the potential to perpetuate a problematized view of bisexuality. The stigmatization of bisexual men and women may be further amplified by research which evaluates bisexual populations against comparatively ‘healthy’heterosexual populations.Researchers from various disciplines have utilized numerous frameworks and theories to understand the biological, psychological, sociological and cultural factors that directly and indirectly influence bisexual men’s and women’s mental, physical and sexual health/well-being. Although the theories are multitudinous, most tend to focus on risk behaviors predating bisexual behavior, or risk behaviors occurring in response to discrimination that bisexual men/women experienced as a result of their bisexual behavior/identity. According to the former theory, men and women who are bisexual tend to have individual characteristics (eg, sensation seeking) that increase their propensity for risk (Benotsch, Kalichman, & Kelly, 1999; Kalichman & Rompa, 1995; Parsons et al., 2008). According to the latter