Group Process in the single-gender Women's Recovery Group compared with mixed-gender Group Drug Counseling.
Group Process in the single-gender Women's Recovery Group compared with mixed-gender Group Drug Counseling.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/1556035x.2013.836867
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gallop RJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Greenfield SF;Kuper LE;Cummings AM;Robbins MS;Gallop RJ
与药物使用障碍（SUD）的混合性别团体治疗相比，成员之间的联系增强被认为是为单一性别的妇女提供更多的支持，并为其功效提供了潜在的作用机制。在单性别与混合性别的SUD组治疗的第一阶段试验中，我们检查了两组治疗，单性别妇女康复组（WRG）和混合性别组药物咨询（GDC）的成员所做的从属声明。28 WRG和17 GDC组治疗磁带进行编码和比较五种类型的从属声明。三种类型的从属声明（协议，支持，并完成一个想法）是高度相关的，更频繁的WRG比GDC（D=0.882，p=0.27）。在GDC中，女性更有可能向男性群体成员提供从属陈述，而不是任何其他方向性组合（p<0.01）。与混合性别相比，单一性别的SUD团体治疗可能会通过更频繁的从属陈述来增强支持。
Enhanced affiliation among members is thought to provide increased support for women in single-gender compared with mixed-gender group therapy for substance use disorders (SUDs) and to provide a potential mechanism of action for its efficacy. In a Stage I trial of single-gender versus mixed-gender group therapy for SUDs we examined affiliative statements made by members in two group treatments, single-gender Women's Recovery Group (WRG) and mixed-gender Group Drug Counseling (GDC). Twenty-eight WRG and 17 GDC group therapy tapes were coded and compared for five types of affiliative statements. Three types of affiliative statements (agreement, supportive, and completing a thought) were highly correlated and were more frequent in WRG than GDC (D=0.882, p=0.27). In GDC, women were more likely to provide an affiliative statement to a male group member than any other combination of directionality (p<0.01). Compared with mixed-gender, single-gender group therapy for SUDs may enhance support through greater frequency of affiliative statements.