Adherence to American diabetes association standards of care by rural health care providers

Adherence to American diabetes association standards of care by rural health care providers
复制标题

DOI:
10.2337/diacare.25.12.2224
复制
发表时间:
2002-12-01
期刊:
影响因子:
16.2
通讯作者:
Zulkowski, K
Zulkowski, K
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Coon, P;Zulkowski, K

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的-以确定农村医疗保健提供者是否符合美国糖尿病协会(ADA)的血糖,血压,血脂管理和预防service.Research设计和方法的临床实践指南-这项研究是使用回顾性图表审查399例45岁及以上,在1999年1月1日至2000年8月1日期间,在蒙大拿州的四个农村卫生机构进行了糖尿病初级保健的明确诊断。结果-Glycoprotein检测是充分的(85%),血糖控制(HbA(1c)7.43 ± 1.7%)高于全国平均水平。高血压和血脂异常的共病状况没有得到很好的管理。平均收缩压(SBP)为139 ± 18.8 mmHg,LDL为119 ± 33 mg/dl。在399例患者中,根据ADA HbA(1c)水平指南,11例患者被认为不需要额外治疗
OBJECTIVE - To determine whether rural health care providers are compliant with American Diabetes Association (ADA) clinical practice guidelines for glycemic, blood pressure, lipid management, and preventative services.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This study was performed using a retrospective chart review of 399 patients 45 years of age and older, with a definitive diagnosis of diabetes seen for primary diabetes care at four rural health facilities in Montana between 1 January 1999 and 1 August 2000.RESULTS - Glycemic testing was adequate (85%), and glycemic control (HbA(1c) 7.43 +/- 1.7%) was above the national average. Comorbid conditions of hypertension and dyslipidemia were not as well managed. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 139 +/- 18.8 mmHg and LDL was 119 +/- 33 mg/dl. Of 399 patients, 11 were considered as needing no additional treatment based on ADA guidelines of an HbA(1c) level