Getting swept off your toe(hold)s: Single-molecule DNA fission analysis offers glimpse into kinetics of branch migration.
Getting swept off your toe(hold)s: Single-molecule DNA fission analysis offers glimpse into kinetics of branch migration.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.bpj.2021.04.014
复制
发表时间:
2021-04
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
M. Spies
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Spies
The predictable, straightforward nature of basepairing and the well-understood physical properties of the double helix make nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) versatile tools for assembly of complex nanostructures as well as nonequilibrium nanodevices. By varying sequences of building blocks, one can assemble virtually any imaginable geometric shape and pattern. At physiological salt concentrations and temperatures, double helixes of B-form DNA and A-form RNA are inherently thermodynamically stable. When, however, a partial duplex is mixed with an invading single strand complementary to the longer strand in the duplex, an exchange of the strands can take place, thus allowing construction of active devices where nucleic acids are used as both structural materials and as a fuel (1). Such strand displacement reactions involving complementary or partially complementary sequences are referred to as ‘‘toeholdmediated’’strand displacement, as the reaction is initiated by pairing of the invading strand to a short singlestranded overhang region(a ‘‘toehold’’) on the substrate strand. The toehold pairing is then followed by eviction of the existing complement to the substrate, known as the ‘‘incumbent’’strand (Fig. 1). Strand displacement is a cornerstone of many nanotechnology applications including self-assembly of complex nanostructures, nanoscale circuits, autonomous walkers, tunable nanodevices, diagnostics for the presence of genetic mutations and polymorphisms, and programmable switches in synthetic biology applications (see (3) for a recent review). In nature, strand displacement, and branch migration in general, is a feature common to many processes of DNA and RNA metabolism such as formation of D-loops during homologous genetic recombination, rearrangements of broken DNA replication forks, branch migration of Holliday junctions, formation and processing of R-loops in RNA transcription, and sequence recognition by the CRISPR-Cas system, among many others. In toehold-mediated strand displacement reactions, the toehold formation is a rate-limiting step. It is also the best-understood step, as one can easily control the reaction rate by changing the toehold length (usually between two and eight nucleotides), toehold sequence, and buffer conditions. Increasing the toehold length generally speeds up the reaction by increasing the association rate and also drives the reaction forward by making the products more thermodynamically favorable than the substrates. One can also control the toehold-mediated strand displacement by deliberately ‘‘hiding’’the toehold domain. This can be achieved by hybridization of the dangling toehold with a removable oligonucleotide, positioning it within a hairpin or triplex forming structure, or by nucleobase caging (reviewed in (3)). The overall reaction rate displays an exponential dependence on the toehold length suggesting that the initial pairing is the rate-limiting step (4), and the overall toehold-mediated strand displacement reaction is commonly modeled as a bimolecular association. Further, a three-step model has been used to quantitatively predict strand displacement kinetics from thermodynamics of DNA hybridization (5). This model takes into account two parameters, which are the rate constants for DNA hybridization and for branch migration, and works reasonably well for sequences devoid of the potential to form secondary structures (5). The proposed energy landscapes for the toehold-mediated strand displacement assume that there is a slight penalty to initiate branch migration (2 kcal/mol at 25 C)(6), after which branch migration proceeds in single basepair steps by a random one …