Old habits die hard: Path dependency and behavioral lock-in
Old habits die hard: Path dependency and behavioral lock-in
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/00213624.2004.11506696
复制
发表时间:
2004-06-01
影响因子:
0.7
通讯作者:
Stack, M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Barnes, W;Gartland, M;Stack, M
An increasing number of scholars have begun to argue that market forces may not automatically select the best technologies or products. During the 1980s and 1990s, Paul David and Brian Arthur published several papers in which they asserted that sub-optimal or inefficient technologies can become" locked in" as industry standards, and, in instances where there are significant network effects, these inefficiencies may persist for extended periods of time (David 1985; Arthur 1989, 1990). 1 David's best-known work in this area is his discussion of the layout of the QWERTY typewriter keyboard, and Arthur's most popular example concerns the struggle for supremacy over VCR format (David 1985; Arthur 1990). They concluded that the commercial success of the QWERTY keyboard and the VHS tape format were dependent on their particular historical paths and was not a simple reflection of product optimality or superiority. Robin Cowan has also published several compelling examples of path dependency (1990, 1996). In his 1990 essay, he put forward a detailed overview of the development of nuclear power reactors in which he argued that light water reactors emerged as the dominant technology despite the fact that it was" not the best technology, either economically or technically." He concluded that the" technology which first makes large advances along its learning curve will emerge dominant." The key explanatory variable in these types of stories is the presence of network effects:" Consumers often place higher value on a product if other consumers also use it.