Considering the value of community engagement for (co-)producing blue–green infrastructure
Considering the value of community engagement for (co-)producing blue–green infrastructure
复制标题
考虑社区参与（共同）生产蓝绿基础设施的价值
DOI：
10.2495/friar180011
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Lamond
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Everett;J. Lamond
本文认为，现在似乎广泛认识到的重要性，使社区参与共同发展和维护可持续的方法，以洪水风险管理（蓝绿基础设施，华大基因）。简要概述了最大化和深化参与的潜在价值：更多的社区购买，改善设施的处理，铺设维护和清除以及潜在的更大的支付意愿，所有这些都改善了系统的功能和可持续性;通过提高认识和理解增加了多种感受到的好处，并希望通过参与过程改善社区的一致性和凝聚力。现在，人们普遍认为参与是一件“好事”，但它有可能成为一个空洞的符号，难以有效执行，除非我们开始分解和分析各个组成部分;分析不同社区可能或多或少奏效的战略，以及在不同方法中如何、什么、在哪里和何时使用。我们认为，参与的方法和模式应取决于更广泛的背景下考虑的发展，改造或新建，规模的用户群，人口特征等。在英国布里斯托的三个案例研究被认为是在他们的特点和参与的历史，使用分析的文件和网站。通过现场视察和与利益攸关方的访谈进一步补充了这一信息。这些案例研究显示出的差异表明，在长期内寻求谨慎和有区别的办法，以努力培养地方社区更真实和更深刻的主人翁感，是有价值的。
This paper considers the now seemingly widely-recognised importance of engaging communities in the co-development and maintenance of sustainable approaches to flood risk management (Blue–Green Infrastructure, BGI). The potential value in maximising and deepening engagement is briefly outlined: more community buy-in, improved treatment of facilities, lay maintenance and clearance as well as potentially greater willingness-to-pay all improving the function and so sustainability of systems; increased multiple felt benefits through heightened awareness and understanding, and hopefully improved community coherence and cohesion developed through the engagement process. Engagement is now generally accepted as a “good thing”, but it risks becoming an empty signifier that is problematic to implement effectively, unless we begin to break down and analyse the various component parts; the strategies more and less likely to work with different communities and the how, what, where and when employed within different approaches. We argue that approaches to and patterns of engagement should be dependent upon the wider context of the development under consideration; retrofit or new-build, scale of user-base, demographic characteristics, etc. Three case-studies in Bristol, UK are considered in respect of their characteristics and engagement histories using analysis of publically available documents and websites. This information is further supplemented through site inspection and stakeholder interviews. These case studies are seen to exhibit differences that demonstrate the value in seeking careful and differentiated approaches over the longer-term in an effort to cultivate a truer and deeper sense of ownership by local communities.
绿色屋顶的看法：英国纽卡斯尔中央商务区业主/占用者
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Everett G
通讯作者：
Everett G