Comparison of chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay based on magnetic microparticles with traditional colorimetric ELISA for the detection of serum α-fetoprotein.

Comparison of chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay based on magnetic microparticles with traditional colorimetric ELISA for the detection of serum α-fetoprotein.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jpha.2011.10.001
复制
发表时间:
2012-04
影响因子:
8.8
通讯作者:
Lin JM
Lin JM
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang QY;Chen H;Lin Z;Lin JM

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

建立了磁性微粒化学发光酶免疫分析法(MmPs-CLEIA),与传统的比色酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)平行检测血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)。系统比较了MmPs-CLEIA和比色ELISA的结果,结果表明,MmPs-CLEIA的免疫试剂用量少,总检测时间短,线性、回收率、精密度、灵敏度和有效性较好。应用MPs-CLEIA和ELISA检测40份血清标本中AFP,并与市售电化学发光免疫分析(ECLIA)试剂盒进行比较。MPs-CLEIA法与ELISA法的相关系数R2=0.6703,但MPs-CLEIA法与ECLIA法的相关性(R2=0.9582)明显优于ELISA法与ECLIA法的相关性(R2=0.6866)。
A chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay based on magnetic microparticles (MmPs-CLEIA) was developed to evaluate serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) in parallel with traditional colorimetric enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A systematic comparison between the MmPs-CLEIA and colorimetric ELISA concluded that the MPs-CLEIA exhibited fewer dosages of immunoreagents, less total assay time, and better linearity, recovery, precision, sensitivity and validity. AFP was detected in forty human serum samples by the proposed MPs-CLEIA and ELISA, and the results were compared with commercial electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) kit. The correlation coefficient between MPs-CLEIA and ELISA was obtained with R2=0.6703; however, the correlation between MPs-CLEIA and ECLIA (R2=0.9582) was obviously better than that between colorimetric ELISA and ECLIA (R2=0.6866).