Awareness of publication guidelines and the responsible conduct of research.
Awareness of publication guidelines and the responsible conduct of research.
复制标题
了解出版指南和负责任的研究行为。
DOI：
10.1080/08989620500217321
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Macrina,FrancisL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Barrett,KirstenA;Funk,CarolynL;Macrina,FrancisL
我们对NIH资助的F32博士后研究员进行了一项纵向调查，以确定在负责任的研究行为（RCR）中的强制性指导是否对研究伦理、作者身份和出版物的意识、注意力和行为判断有可衡量的影响。在参与研究的418名F32研究员中，50%的人知道并参考了关于作者和出版实践的指南，而50%的人不知道或没有参考指南。各组在同行评议出版物总数和第一作者出版物总数、研究经验年限、完成博士学位后的年限和接受RCR培训方面相似。指南意识和使用的平等分布，以及职业发展和成就方面的群体相似性，为我们提供了一个机会来考虑指南的意识和使用是否与作者角色和责任的更广泛的判断相关。研究结果表明，对指南的认识和利用充其量只与新手F32对作者角色和责任的更道德适当的判断和态度有适度的关联。
We have conducted a longitudinal survey of NIH-funded F32 postdoctoral fellows to determine if mandated instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) has measurable effects on awareness of, attentiveness to, and behavioral judgments about research ethics and authorship and publication. Of 418 F32 fellows participating in the study, 50% were aware of and had referred to guidelines on authorship and publication practices while 50% were either unaware of or had not referred to guidelines. Groups were similar with regard to total number of peer-reviewed publications and total number of first author publications, years of research experience, years since completing their doctoral degree, and receipt of RCR training. The equal distribution of guideline awareness and use, and group similarities with regard to career development and achievement provided us with an opportunity to consider whether awareness of and use of guidelines is associated with broader judgments about author roles and responsibilities. The findings suggest that awareness and utilization of guidelines are, at best, only modestly associated with more ethically appropriate judgments and attitudes about author roles and responsibilities among novice F32’s.