Between theory and practice: bridging concepts in HCI research
Between theory and practice: bridging concepts in HCI research
复制标题
理论与实践之间：人机交互研究中的桥梁概念
DOI：
10.1145/2556288.2557342
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Christian Dindler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Peter Dalsgård;Christian Dindler
我们将“桥接概念”作为HCI研究中的中介知识的一种特定形式，介绍了理论和实践之间的概念。我们认为，桥接概念解决了HCI中促进理论与实践之间交流的挑战，我们将其与其他知识的其他中介形式进行了比较，例如强大的概念和概念构造。我们建议桥接概念具有三个定义成分：理论基础，一组设计表达以及一系列示例，这些示例证明了其应用的范围和潜力。这些成分指定桥接概念是一种知识形式，对理论和实践都负责。我们对“窥视孔”的概念进行了分析，以此作为旨在激发用户好奇心和参与度的桥接概念的一个例子。
We present the notion of "bridging concepts" as a particular form of intermediary knowledge in HCI research, residing between theory and practice. We argue that bridging concepts address the challenge of facilitating exchange between theory and practice in HCI, and we compare it to other intermediary forms of knowledge such as strong concepts and conceptual constructs. We propose that bridging concepts have three defining constituents: a theoretical foundation, a set of design articulations and a range of exemplars that demonstrate the scope and potential of their application. These constituents specify how bridging concepts, as a form of knowledge, are accountable to both theory and practice. We present an analysis of the concept of "peepholes" as an example of a bridging concept aimed at spurring user curiosity and engagement.