Self-Determination Undetermined: The Case of East Timor
Self-Determination Undetermined: The Case of East Timor
复制标题
自决未定：东帝汶案例
DOI：
10.1017/s0922156596000131
复制
发表时间：
1996
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
C. Drew
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
I. Scobbie;C. Drew
1991年2月22日，葡萄牙向国际法院书记官处提出控告澳大利亚的案件，就关于“澳大利亚在东帝汶的某些活动”的争端提起诉讼。此案背后的推动力是澳大利亚和印度尼西亚于1989年12月缔结的《帝汶沟条约》。申请书指称，澳大利亚的行为“对东帝汶人民和葡萄牙造成了特别严重的法律的和道义损害，如果开始开采油气资源，这些损害也将成为物质损害”。管辖权的依据是当事方根据《规约》第三十六条第二款作出的声明。
On 22 February 1991, Portugal filed a case against Australia in the Registry of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) instituting proceedings in a dispute concerning “certain activities of Australia with regard to East Timor”. The impetus behind the case was the conclusion of the Timor Gap Treaty between Australia and Indonesia in December 1989. The application alleged that Australia's conduct had caused “particularly serious legal and moral damage to the people of East Timor and to Portugal, which will become material damage also if the exploitation of hydrocarbon resources begins.” Jurisdiction was founded on the parties' declarations under Article 36(2) of the Statute.